To me, partial -preterism amillenial makes the most sense over post -millennialism, I don't know where the author stands on preterism.
My point is if you believe we are in the millennial reign now then it makes more sense that the events of the revelation before chapter 20 must have occured already.
The scriptures that the author points out is why I reject post-millenialism because Christ accomplished the binding with his work in the cross, in his first coming. It is a now event not a future one.
Thanks for reading, Jonathan! I'm thankful this was helpful. I do think this makes the most sense of OT prophecies, as well as some of the specific statements within the NT, as I wrote about here.
May the Lord bless you richly as you continue to study his Word!
thank you!--Please consider completing the sermon. "until the thousand years were ended. After that he must be released for a little while."
https://www.metropolitantabernacle.org/School-of-Theology/1979-Rare-Messages-from-Dr-William-Hendriksen/Revelation-and-its-Climax
Thank you for sharing this! I will check this out.
To me, partial -preterism amillenial makes the most sense over post -millennialism, I don't know where the author stands on preterism.
My point is if you believe we are in the millennial reign now then it makes more sense that the events of the revelation before chapter 20 must have occured already.
The scriptures that the author points out is why I reject post-millenialism because Christ accomplished the binding with his work in the cross, in his first coming. It is a now event not a future one.
Really appreciate what you shared as it makes sense to me
Thanks for reading, Jonathan! I'm thankful this was helpful. I do think this makes the most sense of OT prophecies, as well as some of the specific statements within the NT, as I wrote about here.
May the Lord bless you richly as you continue to study his Word!